{"status":true,"post":{"id":80838,"user_id":29,"status":1,"type":1,"orde":null,"notification_type":0,"static_post":0,"published_at":"2025-12-26 09:07:00","created_at":"2025-12-26T06:07:00.000000Z","updated_at":"2025-12-26T06:07:00.000000Z","edited_at":"2025-12-26 09:07:00","source_id":null,"post_id":80838,"is_featured":0,"title":"Yapay zeka destekli g\u00f6rsellerin telif hakk\u0131 korumas\u0131","slider_title":null,"slider_title_2":null,"slider_spot_title":null,"slider_spot_title_2":null,"home_title":"Yapay zeka destekli g\u00f6rsellerin telif hakk\u0131 korumas\u0131","sub_title":null,"category_id":73,"description":null,"content":"<p id=\"isPasted\"><strong>Yapay zeka teknolojilerinin fikri m\u00fclkiyet hukuku bak\u0131m\u0131ndan do\u011furdu\u011fu sorunlar, \u00f6zellikle eser sahipli\u011finin tespiti ve eser niteli\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tart\u0131\u015fmalara konu oluyor. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede, \u00c7in\u2019de Beijing Internet Court taraf\u0131ndan 27 Kas\u0131m 2023 tarihinde verilen ve kamuoyunda \u2018Li v. Liu\u2019 olarak an\u0131lan karar, yapay zeka yoluyla olu\u015fturulan i\u00e7eriklerin telif hakk\u0131 korumas\u0131na tabi olup olmayaca\u011f\u0131 sorusuna ili\u015fkin dikkate de\u011fer bir karar niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131yor.<\/strong><\/p><p><br><\/p><p>Karara konu olayda, davac\u0131 Bay Li, Stabla Diffusion isimli a\u00e7\u0131k kaynakl\u0131 bir yapay zeka program\u0131 kullanmak suretiyle belirli komutla ve teknik parametreler arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6rseli Xiaohongshu (K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck K\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 Kitap) adl\u0131 sosyal medya platformunda payla\u015ft\u0131. Daval\u0131 Liu ise s\u00f6z konusu g\u00f6rseli herhangi bir izin almadan ve kayna\u011f\u0131 belirtmeksizin bir blog yaz\u0131s\u0131nda kulland\u0131, ayr\u0131ca g\u00f6rselin \u00fczerinde yer alan filigran\u0131 da sildi. Davac\u0131, eser \u00fczerindeki eser sahipli\u011fi ve bilgi a\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerinden yay\u0131m haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek, daval\u0131dan \u00f6z\u00fcr ve tazminat talebinde bulundu.<\/p><p><br><\/p><p>Dava konusu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 mahkeme 3. temel hukuki mesele \u00fczerinden de\u011ferlendirdi.<\/p><p><br><\/p><p><strong>1. G\u00f6rselin eser niteli\u011fi<\/strong><\/p><p>Mahkeme, g\u00f6rselin \u00c7in Telif Hakk\u0131 Kanunu\u2019nun 3. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda \u2018g\u00f6rsel sanat eseri\u2019 niteli\u011finde bir eser oldu\u011funu kabul etti. Kararda, g\u00f6rselin yaln\u0131zca bir yapay zeka yaz\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u00fcretilmi\u015f haz\u0131r bir \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; tersine, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcn komutlar belirleyerek, model ve parametre se\u00e7imi yaparak yarat\u0131c\u0131 s\u00fcrece aktif \u015fekilde kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurguland\u0131. Bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle eser, entelekt\u00fcel bir katk\u0131 sonucu ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131, belirli bir estetik tercihi ve ki\u015fisel ifadeyi yans\u0131tmak suretiyle orijinallik kriterini kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131.<\/p><p><br><\/p><p><strong>2. Eser sahipli\u011fi ve telif hakk\u0131<\/strong><\/p><p>\u00c7in Telif Hakk\u0131 Kanunu uyar\u0131nca, eser sahibinin ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi olmas\u0131 zorunlu. Yapay zekan\u0131n hukuki bir s\u00fcje olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle eser sahipli\u011fi s\u0131fat\u0131 kazanamayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi. Mahkeme, eserin olu\u015fum s\u00fcrecine y\u00f6nelik se\u00e7im, d\u00fczenleme ve estetik kararlar\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini tespit etti; bu nedenle telif hakk\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcnhas\u0131ran davac\u0131ya ait oldu\u011funa h\u00fckmetti. Ayr\u0131ca, davac\u0131n\u0131n eseri \u2018AI illustration\u2019 etiketiyle payla\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n, d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck kural\u0131 ve kamunun bilgilendirilmesi y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yeterli oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirildi.<\/p><p><br><\/p><p><strong>3. Hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali ve sorumluluk<\/strong><\/p><p>Mahkeme, daval\u0131n\u0131n eseri izinsiz kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n ve \u00fczerinde yer alan filigran\u0131 silmesinin, eser sahibinin hem yayma hem de ad\u0131n\u0131n belirtilmesini isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fine kanaat getirdi. Bu do\u011frultuda, daval\u0131dan kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u00f6z\u00fcr yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 ve davac\u0131ya maddi tazminat \u00f6demesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm kuruldu.<\/p><p><br><\/p><p>Li v. Liu karar\u0131, YZ yoluyla \u00fcretilen i\u00e7eriklerin telif hukuku kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilebilmesi i\u00e7in ki\u015fisel katk\u0131n\u0131n ve yarat\u0131c\u0131 m\u00fcdahalenin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 esas alan bir yakla\u015f\u0131m benimsiyor. Bu karar\u0131n \u00f6nemi, \u015fu temel ilkelerde somutla\u015f\u0131yor: Yapay zeka bir ara\u00e7t\u0131r; yarat\u0131c\u0131 s\u00fcre\u00e7teki \u00f6zne insand\u0131r. Eser niteli\u011fi i\u00e7in \u2018orijinallik\u2019 ve \u2018entelekt\u00fcel emek\u2019 \u015fartlar\u0131 korunuyor. Telif hakk\u0131 sahibinin, teknolojik ara\u00e7lar\u0131 kullanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 tek ba\u015f\u0131na bu haklardan feragat anlam\u0131na gelmez.<\/p><p><br><\/p><p>Mahkeme, teknolojik ilerlemenin insan yarat\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerindeki etkisini kabul etmekle birlikte, bu ilerlemenin telif hakk\u0131 sistemini i\u015flevsiz k\u0131lmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a vurguland\u0131. Bu do\u011frultuda, yarat\u0131c\u0131 s\u00fcrece insan m\u00fcdahalesi bulundu\u011fu s\u00fcrece, YZ ara\u00e7lar\u0131yla \u00fcretilen i\u00e7eriklerin de telif hakk\u0131 korumas\u0131ndan yararlanabilece\u011fi ifade edildi.<\/p><p><br><\/p><p>Sonu\u00e7 olarak, Beijing Internet Court\u2019un bu karar\u0131, k\u00fcresel \u00f6l\u00e7ekte YZ ve fikri m\u00fclkiyet ili\u015fkine dair tart\u0131\u015fmalara y\u00f6n verecek nitelikte. Hen\u00fcz bir\u00e7ok hukuk sisteminde tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 olan bu konuya dair mahkeme, belirleyici olan\u0131n \u00fcretim s\u00fcrecine insan katk\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde i\u00e7tihat geli\u015ftirdi.<\/p><p><br><\/p><p>Bu karar, T\u00fcrkiye dahil olmak \u00fczere pek \u00e7ok \u00fclkenin mevzuat ve uygulamas\u0131nda hen\u00fcz a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a d\u00fczenlenmemi\u015f bu alanda yeni bir hukuki \u00e7er\u00e7eve olu\u015fumuna katk\u0131 sunabilecek nitelikte olup, benzer uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda mahkemelere yol g\u00f6sterici olabilir.<\/p>","slug":"yapay-zeka-destekli-gorsellerin-telif-hakki-korumasi","tags":null,"meta_title":"Yapay zeka destekli g\u00f6rsellerin telif hakk\u0131 korumas\u0131","meta_description":"Yapay zeka teknolojilerinin fikri m\u00fclkiyet hukuku bak\u0131m\u0131ndan do\u011furdu\u011fu sorunlar, \u00f6zellikle eser sahipli\u011finin tespiti ve eser niteli\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tart\u0131\u015fmalara konu oluyor. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede, \u00c7in\u2019de Beijing Internet Court taraf\u0131ndan 27 Kas\u0131m 2023 tarihinde verilen ve kamuoyunda \u2018Li v. Liu\u2019 olarak an\u0131lan karar, yapay zeka yoluyla olu\u015fturulan i\u00e7eriklerin telif hakk\u0131 korumas\u0131na tabi olup olmayaca\u011f\u0131 sorusuna ili\u015fkin dikkate de\u011fer bir karar niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131yor.","meta_keywords":null,"news_cover_min":"\/front\/uploads\/blog\/thumbnail\/1766696400lwBeIrifCKosiXw.webp","news_cover":null,"news_video_min":null,"news_video":null,"view_count":0,"cropped_1200x675":"\/front\/uploads\/haber\/1200x675\/yapay-zeka-destekli-gorsellerin-telif-hakki-korumasi_1200x675_9XCU4dTvSI.webp","user":{"id":29,"name":"MUHAMMET","surname":"AKSAN","email":"av-muhammet-aksan@gmail.com","slug":"av-muhammet-aksan","avatar":"\/front\/uploads\/avatar\/1733691600IewiFiiT1aT8ZK3.webp","status":1,"role":1,"email_verified_at":null,"orde":null,"created_at":"2022-10-24T10:51:30.000000Z","updated_at":"2024-12-18T09:45:38.000000Z","seo_title":null,"seo_description":null},"translations":[{"id":80970,"is_featured":0,"is_amp":0,"is_ads":0,"ads_link":null,"post_id":80838,"locale":"tr","category_id":73,"title":"Yapay zeka destekli g\u00f6rsellerin telif hakk\u0131 korumas\u0131","home_title":"Yapay zeka destekli g\u00f6rsellerin telif hakk\u0131 korumas\u0131","sub_title":null,"slider_title":null,"slider_title_2":null,"slider_spot_title":null,"slider_spot_title_2":null,"subtitleuse":0,"description":null,"content":"<p id=\"isPasted\"><strong>Yapay zeka teknolojilerinin fikri m\u00fclkiyet hukuku bak\u0131m\u0131ndan do\u011furdu\u011fu sorunlar, \u00f6zellikle eser sahipli\u011finin tespiti ve eser niteli\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tart\u0131\u015fmalara konu oluyor. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede, \u00c7in\u2019de Beijing Internet Court taraf\u0131ndan 27 Kas\u0131m 2023 tarihinde verilen ve kamuoyunda \u2018Li v. Liu\u2019 olarak an\u0131lan karar, yapay zeka yoluyla olu\u015fturulan i\u00e7eriklerin telif hakk\u0131 korumas\u0131na tabi olup olmayaca\u011f\u0131 sorusuna ili\u015fkin dikkate de\u011fer bir karar niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131yor.<\/strong><\/p><p><br><\/p><p>Karara konu olayda, davac\u0131 Bay Li, Stabla Diffusion isimli a\u00e7\u0131k kaynakl\u0131 bir yapay zeka program\u0131 kullanmak suretiyle belirli komutla ve teknik parametreler arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6rseli Xiaohongshu (K\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck K\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 Kitap) adl\u0131 sosyal medya platformunda payla\u015ft\u0131. Daval\u0131 Liu ise s\u00f6z konusu g\u00f6rseli herhangi bir izin almadan ve kayna\u011f\u0131 belirtmeksizin bir blog yaz\u0131s\u0131nda kulland\u0131, ayr\u0131ca g\u00f6rselin \u00fczerinde yer alan filigran\u0131 da sildi. Davac\u0131, eser \u00fczerindeki eser sahipli\u011fi ve bilgi a\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerinden yay\u0131m haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek, daval\u0131dan \u00f6z\u00fcr ve tazminat talebinde bulundu.<\/p><p><br><\/p><p>Dava konusu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 mahkeme 3. temel hukuki mesele \u00fczerinden de\u011ferlendirdi.<\/p><p><br><\/p><p><strong>1. G\u00f6rselin eser niteli\u011fi<\/strong><\/p><p>Mahkeme, g\u00f6rselin \u00c7in Telif Hakk\u0131 Kanunu\u2019nun 3. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda \u2018g\u00f6rsel sanat eseri\u2019 niteli\u011finde bir eser oldu\u011funu kabul etti. Kararda, g\u00f6rselin yaln\u0131zca bir yapay zeka yaz\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u00fcretilmi\u015f haz\u0131r bir \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; tersine, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcn komutlar belirleyerek, model ve parametre se\u00e7imi yaparak yarat\u0131c\u0131 s\u00fcrece aktif \u015fekilde kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurguland\u0131. Bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle eser, entelekt\u00fcel bir katk\u0131 sonucu ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131, belirli bir estetik tercihi ve ki\u015fisel ifadeyi yans\u0131tmak suretiyle orijinallik kriterini kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131.<\/p><p><br><\/p><p><strong>2. Eser sahipli\u011fi ve telif hakk\u0131<\/strong><\/p><p>\u00c7in Telif Hakk\u0131 Kanunu uyar\u0131nca, eser sahibinin ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi olmas\u0131 zorunlu. Yapay zekan\u0131n hukuki bir s\u00fcje olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle eser sahipli\u011fi s\u0131fat\u0131 kazanamayaca\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtildi. Mahkeme, eserin olu\u015fum s\u00fcrecine y\u00f6nelik se\u00e7im, d\u00fczenleme ve estetik kararlar\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini tespit etti; bu nedenle telif hakk\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcnhas\u0131ran davac\u0131ya ait oldu\u011funa h\u00fckmetti. Ayr\u0131ca, davac\u0131n\u0131n eseri \u2018AI illustration\u2019 etiketiyle payla\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n, d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck kural\u0131 ve kamunun bilgilendirilmesi y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yeterli oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirildi.<\/p><p><br><\/p><p><strong>3. Hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali ve sorumluluk<\/strong><\/p><p>Mahkeme, daval\u0131n\u0131n eseri izinsiz kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n ve \u00fczerinde yer alan filigran\u0131 silmesinin, eser sahibinin hem yayma hem de ad\u0131n\u0131n belirtilmesini isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fine kanaat getirdi. Bu do\u011frultuda, daval\u0131dan kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u00f6z\u00fcr yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 ve davac\u0131ya maddi tazminat \u00f6demesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm kuruldu.<\/p><p><br><\/p><p>Li v. Liu karar\u0131, YZ yoluyla \u00fcretilen i\u00e7eriklerin telif hukuku kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilebilmesi i\u00e7in ki\u015fisel katk\u0131n\u0131n ve yarat\u0131c\u0131 m\u00fcdahalenin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 esas alan bir yakla\u015f\u0131m benimsiyor. Bu karar\u0131n \u00f6nemi, \u015fu temel ilkelerde somutla\u015f\u0131yor: Yapay zeka bir ara\u00e7t\u0131r; yarat\u0131c\u0131 s\u00fcre\u00e7teki \u00f6zne insand\u0131r. Eser niteli\u011fi i\u00e7in \u2018orijinallik\u2019 ve \u2018entelekt\u00fcel emek\u2019 \u015fartlar\u0131 korunuyor. Telif hakk\u0131 sahibinin, teknolojik ara\u00e7lar\u0131 kullanm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 tek ba\u015f\u0131na bu haklardan feragat anlam\u0131na gelmez.<\/p><p><br><\/p><p>Mahkeme, teknolojik ilerlemenin insan yarat\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczerindeki etkisini kabul etmekle birlikte, bu ilerlemenin telif hakk\u0131 sistemini i\u015flevsiz k\u0131lmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a vurguland\u0131. Bu do\u011frultuda, yarat\u0131c\u0131 s\u00fcrece insan m\u00fcdahalesi bulundu\u011fu s\u00fcrece, YZ ara\u00e7lar\u0131yla \u00fcretilen i\u00e7eriklerin de telif hakk\u0131 korumas\u0131ndan yararlanabilece\u011fi ifade edildi.<\/p><p><br><\/p><p>Sonu\u00e7 olarak, Beijing Internet Court\u2019un bu karar\u0131, k\u00fcresel \u00f6l\u00e7ekte YZ ve fikri m\u00fclkiyet ili\u015fkine dair tart\u0131\u015fmalara y\u00f6n verecek nitelikte. Hen\u00fcz bir\u00e7ok hukuk sisteminde tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 olan bu konuya dair mahkeme, belirleyici olan\u0131n \u00fcretim s\u00fcrecine insan katk\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde i\u00e7tihat geli\u015ftirdi.<\/p><p><br><\/p><p>Bu karar, T\u00fcrkiye dahil olmak \u00fczere pek \u00e7ok \u00fclkenin mevzuat ve uygulamas\u0131nda hen\u00fcz a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a d\u00fczenlenmemi\u015f bu alanda yeni bir hukuki \u00e7er\u00e7eve olu\u015fumuna katk\u0131 sunabilecek nitelikte olup, benzer uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda mahkemelere yol g\u00f6sterici olabilir.<\/p>","slug":"yapay-zeka-destekli-gorsellerin-telif-hakki-korumasi","orjinalimage":"\/front\/uploads\/blog\/thumbnail\/1766696400lwBeIrifCKosiXw.webp","news_cover_min":"\/front\/uploads\/blog\/thumbnail\/1766696400lwBeIrifCKosiXw.webp","news_cover":null,"news_video_min":null,"news_video":null,"cropped_638x552":"\/front\/uploads\/haber\/638x552\/yapay-zeka-destekli-gorsellerin-telif-hakki-korumasi_638x552_gncjuWxWZk.webp","cropped_310x208":"\/front\/uploads\/haber\/310x208\/yapay-zeka-destekli-gorsellerin-telif-hakki-korumasi_310x208_wrYex80pkU.webp","cropped_416x247":"\/front\/uploads\/haber\/416x247\/yapay-zeka-destekli-gorsellerin-telif-hakki-korumasi_416x247_jGE9xdF3S9.webp","cropped_197x247":"\/front\/uploads\/haber\/197x247\/yapay-zeka-destekli-gorsellerin-telif-hakki-korumasi_197x247_dOI1lwe7Uy.webp","cropped_416x600":"\/front\/uploads\/haber\/416x600\/yapay-zeka-destekli-gorsellerin-telif-hakki-korumasi_416x600_OMBDrx7uQG.webp","cropped_1200x675":"\/front\/uploads\/haber\/1200x675\/yapay-zeka-destekli-gorsellerin-telif-hakki-korumasi_1200x675_9XCU4dTvSI.webp","tags":null,"meta_title":"Yapay zeka destekli g\u00f6rsellerin telif hakk\u0131 korumas\u0131","meta_description":"Yapay zeka teknolojilerinin fikri m\u00fclkiyet hukuku bak\u0131m\u0131ndan do\u011furdu\u011fu sorunlar, \u00f6zellikle eser sahipli\u011finin tespiti ve eser niteli\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tart\u0131\u015fmalara konu oluyor. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede, \u00c7in\u2019de Beijing Internet Court taraf\u0131ndan 27 Kas\u0131m 2023 tarihinde verilen ve kamuoyunda \u2018Li v. Liu\u2019 olarak an\u0131lan karar, yapay zeka yoluyla olu\u015fturulan i\u00e7eriklerin telif hakk\u0131 korumas\u0131na tabi olup olmayaca\u011f\u0131 sorusuna ili\u015fkin dikkate de\u011fer bir karar niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131yor.","meta_keywords":null,"view_count":0,"yt":0,"ytid":"","ytimage":null,"imgdate":"2000-01-01 00:00:00","cuff_cover":null,"cropped_358x214":"\/front\/uploads\/haber\/358x214\/yapay-zeka-destekli-gorsellerin-telif-hakki-korumasi_358x214_BqENWZdkK6.webp","cropped_842x474":"\/front\/uploads\/haber\/842x474\/yapay-zeka-destekli-gorsellerin-telif-hakki-korumasi_842x474_wTQQgNv3d4.webp"}]}}